Thursday, December 26, 2019

Buy Research Paper

Research papers have become staple items of college courses Struggling students work hard to meet their school requirements along with their life requirements, but many students will eventually look online to buy research papers. If you are a struggling student needing assistance due to strict time requirements, or other complications, you need to have writers on your side that will assist you to your requests. When you need to buy custom research papers, you need reliable writers that are dedicated to your success, writers who can provide you with the assistance you need to accomplish your goals. Our writers not only come with degrees and experience, but our writers provide research papers to buy from experience you can see from samples and examples that demonstrate their commitment to their topics, to strong communication skills, and to professionalism that you need for your written work. Do not just buy research papers online, buy high quality assistance from writers you can evaluate and review ThePensters.com writers are professional wr iters committed to your success. Writers with proof of talent and success in communications Our writers provide you proof and verification of their skills, and when you need buy research paper assistance, proof is what you need before you involve money and time into the process. You can read the examples and samples by our writers, writers who have dedicated themselves to the highest quality writing and research, and when you buy custom research papers from these writers, you will not be surprised, because you can see their successful work in their profile and their blog. Our writers do not just provide you with research papers to buy, they provide you with a quality service that assists you the way you need help, custom assistance dedicated to your specific needs when you need to buy research papers online. The highest quality research papers When you want quality, professionalism, and writers who are available for you to review, you need a service that does more than just let you buy research papers, you need a custom service with professional writers available to review and select from when you buy custom research papers. ThePensters.com is your home to writers that are visible, no longer hidden behind a wall, but up front and ready to show you their skills and degrees. Do not settle for less when you need research papers to buy from professional writers. Get the quality you deserve, the skills you need, and the evidence that your choices are best when you buy research papers online.

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Katherine Mansfield And Ernest Hemmingway Are Both Published

Katherine Mansfield and Ernest Hemmingway are both published writers. One was born in New Zealand and the other in the United States during the late 19th century. This paper will compare and contrast the setting, plot, imagery, climax, and theme between Mansfield’s â€Å"Miss Brill† and Hemmingway’s â€Å"Cat in the Rain.† The setting in â€Å"Miss Brill† takes place in a public garden in France. The story states the band plays in the Jardins Publiques (Public Gardens) in France (15). Miss Brill, the protagonist, is proceeding on a Sunday afternoon to the gardens where she will listen to a band. Mansfield tells us there were a number of other people out that afternoon, more than any other Sunday. The time of year appears to be autumn. Mansfield†¦show more content†¦She is a lady vicariously living through those around her. She makes observations of the patient Englishman and his nagging wife (15). Furthermore, she observes two young girls laughing and meeting up with two soldiers (15). Nearby resides a stiff man with a woman. The man indifference to the woman makes Miss Brill angry. She whispered over and over â€Å"The Brute! The Brute!† (16). She was also unimpressed by a beautiful woman that passed by. She dropped some violets, which a young boy picked up and gave b ack to her. However Miss Brill see’s the woman throw the flowers away. She exclaims, â€Å"Dear me!† (16). Miss Brill views the events as a play as if she is an actress. Each individual have their parts. Even the fur she wears around her head has a part in the play. Mansfield advises, â€Å"It was exactly like a play. Who could believe the sky at the back wasn’t painted?† (17). In contrast, the characters in the plot of â€Å"Cat in the Rain† are limited to the American couple, a cat, the padrone, and a maid. The American wife sees a cat from her window. Hemingway states, â€Å"A cat was crouched under one of the dripping green tables† (62). She desires to retrieve the cat against the indifference of her husband. The American wife states, â€Å"I’m going down and get that kitty† (62). George, her husband, half-heartedly offers to retrieve it for her. He was indifferent to the episode. Hemingway advises us that he went on reading and

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Romeo And Juliet Comparison Essay Example For Students

Romeo And Juliet Comparison Essay Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare and Romeo and Juliet interpreted by Zeffirelli are two versions of a classic tale of two young lovers. In reading Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet and viewing Zeffirellis Romeo and Juliet one becomes aware of many differences between them. Although the basic storyline remains the same, the differences are obvious. These differences can be found in the setting, characters and their speeches, and the culmination of the story. These differences between the versions produce two entirely different interpretations of the story. Zeffirelli changed the story by changing important scene by use of omitting characters or switching the order of the events. For example in Act V, when the Prince gave his final speech, Friar Laurence was supposed to be present to give his own confession, but was left out by Zeffirellis version. This left the explanation of why the lovers were truly dead for the watchers to question. Shakespeare had Montague raise a statue in Juliets honor, signifying the end of their feud. Zeffirelli, on the other hand, chose only to show the two lords together making for a weaker end. The omission of characters from important scene was not the only change noted between the two. Zeffirelli also took poetic license in the creation of Romeo and Juliet. He gave his lines to characters when in Shakespeare they were spoken by another. This was shown during the party scene, Act I, scene V when Lord Capulet was to rebuke Tybalt and call him†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.saucy boy†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ The line was instead given to Lady Capulet. This exchange of lines between the characters does not always help in the understanding of the story. The use of adding lines to characters created different personalities and gave the characters greater insight than in Shakespeares version. It added in helping understand the characters motives more. Zeffirelli also had some positive differences than that of Shakespeare. Since the setting was in the same time period as Shakespeares rendition the reader could visualize the environment and dress of the era. This made the characters and story more life-like than trying to picture it from a written page. Zeffirelli also fleshed-out the characters, giving them more depth and emotion than in Romeo and Juliet. This is shown when the nurse goes to Juliet and finds her dead. She runs out of Juliets chamber screaming and flailing her arms in a frenzy. The audience was able to interact with the characters and their emotions by seeing Romeo and Juliet visually, also making the language more understandable. An example of this is when Romeo kills himself and Juliet sees him, hears guards, and you are able to see Juliet frantic. As a result of this, the scene is made more complete, causing the audience to experience greater tension than reading the play. Even though Zeffirelli gave more definition to some characters, Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet was more enjoyable. Although he did not give as much information as to what was happening, he allowed the reader more freedom to interpret the situations on their own. Without the reader having readShakespeares Romeo and Juliet most of the symbolism in Zeffirellis version would not have been understood. The two different authors used a variety of techniques to change the story or to have the audience understand the siuations. Though they may seem different at times, the storyline never changes, it always remains about two young lovers who tragically die as a result of snap-decisions.

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

The Ethics of Eliminating the Federal Debt through Cuts to Entitlement Programs

The task of every government is to protect human rights and Primary Social Goods, such as â€Å"income, wealth, rights, liberties, opportunities, status, and self-respect† (Shaw Barry 2011). The issue of business ethics is a primary point that should be taken into consideration when it comes about the economy of the country, reforms that can influence the welfare of citizens and national budget.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Ethics of Eliminating the Federal Debt through Cuts to Entitlement Programs specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The positions of justice, economic distribution, equality of income, etc are to be considered when a particular political decision comes to action. In this paper we are going to analyze the business ethics of eliminating the federal debt through cuts to entitlement programs that are under close consideration these days. There are many opponents and supporters to the Obama’s project to push cuts in popular programs in order to reduce the budget deficit. The question to be discussed is how this program can influence citizens and what the ethical issues of this project. In order to explore this question, first of all, we should consider the sense of business ethics, its basic points and how it is applicable to political issues. According to William H. Shaw (2003), â€Å"business ethics is a set of principle or reasons which should govern the conduct of business, whether at the individual or collective level† (p. 2). The purpose of the business ethics is to introduce the moral issues and a set of values to guide the actions of individual and organizations in the business environment. Everyone who is engaged in business or politics should follow the ethical code to reach the harmony with the community in which one lives. Some aspects of the business ethics can be explained from the political perspective. â€Å"Politics represents the commitment to different basic values and will represent liberal and conservative extremes or some compromise in-between† (Betz 1998, p. 693). It is very important for politicians to follow the ethical code, as they are responsible for lives and well-being of many people. The case under consideration undermines such issues of business ethics, as justice, morality, distribution of social benefits and burdens. Thus, the case under consideration is presented in the article by Lisa Lerer â€Å"Ryan Budget Plan Defended as Republicans Return Home to Voters†.Advertising Looking for research paper on political culture? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The case is about the 2012 budget plan â€Å"a proposal that cuts more than $6 trillion in federal spending over 10 years, privatizes Medicare and caps Medicaid† (Lerer 2011, n. p.). The budget plan was met with a criticism and provoked many debates. The â€Å"fig hts† around address the political risk opposing Republicans. The spotlight of the plan is â€Å"long-term government deficits that will shape the country’s economic future and frame next year’s elections† (Lerer 2011, n. p.). One of the issues is to reform the Medicare which suggests the cuts in entitlements. This can influence the vulnerable members of society. The attempts to trim the budget deficit can have negative consequences for people and lower the standards of living. However, first-term Republican Representative of Pennsylvania Lou Barletta commented on this decision, â€Å"This is a defining moment for this generation, that this Congress has the courage to go forward and reform a very difficult issue such as Medicare.  We’re doing it even at risk of our own political future† (Lerer 2011, n. p.). The plan provided by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan suggests to:  slash U.S. spending by $6.2 trillion over a decade by cut ting Medicare and scores of other programs including Medicaid, food stamps, farm subsidies and Pell college tuition grants. His plan would replace Medicare by providing those under the age of 55 with subsidies to buy private health insurance (Lerer 2011, n. p.) This plan was taken by Democrats as a headstone of the Republican’s 2012 strategy. They claim that this plan will impact the senior citizens of the United States depriving them of the Medicare benefits. The debates around the program continue to develop. The outcomes of this plan are crucial for U.S citizens, as well as for the political parties, as they will influence the results of the 2012 elections. It seems that the core idea of this article to shed light on the impact of the 2012 budget plan, but the debate that we can observe in this case raise more important questions, the questions of business ethics. In particular, the responsibilities of government before American citizens, moral issue, justice and social go ods.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Ethics of Eliminating the Federal Debt through Cuts to Entitlement Programs specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In this regard, the case reflects the points raised in the Shaw and Barry book Moral Issues in Business. The first issue that seems to be explicitly discussed in the article is justice. According to Shaw Barry (2001), â€Å"justice is one important aspect of morality. Talk of justice and injustice generally involves appeals to the related notions of fairness, equality, desert, and rights† (p. 122). Thus, in the article we can see that Democrats emphasize that the plan will be vulnerable to citizens as it will impact their interests and benefits they get. Thus, we can assume that the plan suggested by Republicans confronts the idea of the distributive Justice that suggests â€Å"proper distribution of social benefits and burdens† (Shaw Barry 2001, p. 104). In fact, the plan can really seem to be provocative and disadvantageous for senior citizens, however, one should look at it with â€Å"open mind† and consider that it is not aimed at impacting people, but enhancing the economic situation in the country, thus the results of this plan will improve the situation in future. It is crucial that â€Å"economic distribution might be based on pure equality, need, effort, social contribution, or merit† (Shaw Barry 2001, p. 122), and plan seems not demonstrating these traits (which is the main argument of Democrats) and Republicans understand this. In addition, they understand that they are putting at risk their political future, but they do not see other way to enhance the situation. What they should do is to provide convincing evidences that their plan will be beneficial for all Americans and that their final goal is to improve the economy of the country so that everybody was satisfied with policies and standar ds of living because as stated in the book by Shaw Barry (2011), â€Å"Mill contended, more specifically, that the concept of justice identifies certain rules or rights the upholding of which is crucial for promoting well-being and that injustice always involves violating the rights of some identifiable individual† (p. 122).Advertising Looking for research paper on political culture? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Thus, it can be very difficult to achieve â€Å"common benefits† without some â€Å"sacrifices†. Another ethical issue that can be discussed in this case deals with the relations between parties. Though both of them debate about the plan, the situation reminds the struggle for the political dominance. They often mention the elections of the 2012, and it seems that they use the plan as tool to protect their political positions and attack a contestant. In this light, they are focused on their personal interests, and not on the interests of citizens, thus, they do not follow the principles of the business ethics. What they might do is to stop fighting and focus on common aim: to improve the plan so that it was effective and met economic interests, as well as interests of Americans. Shaw Barry (2011) provide that â€Å"society is a cooperative project for mutual benefit and that justice requires us to reduce the social and economic consequences of arbitrary natural diffe rences among people† (p. 123). The main task of the government it to remember this statement and make it serve a guide for their actions and decisions. In the case provided in the article, we can see that political parties do not follow this rule and forget that â€Å"each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others† (Shaw Barry 2011, p. 118).   Moreover, they seem to protect their personal interests in their debates and not the interests of the nation. Thus, on the one hand, the case illustrates the points stated in chapter 3 of the book by Shaw Barry about business ethics, on the other hand, it demonstrates how the principles of the business ethics are violated by political parties. We should emphasize that business ethics is crucial for politicians and they should always remember about it, otherwise they may lose trust and respect of people. Reference List Betz, J. (1998). Business Ethics and Politics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8 (4) (Oct., 1998), 693-702. Web. Lerer, L. (2011). Ryan Budget Plan Defended as Republicans Return Home to Voters. Bloomberg Businessweek. Web. Shaw, W. H. (2003). Ethics at Work: Basic Readings in Business Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shaw, W. H., Barry, V. E. (2001). Moral Issues in Business. Belmont: Wadsworth. This research paper on The Ethics of Eliminating the Federal Debt through Cuts to Entitlement Programs was written and submitted by user Dexter N. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.